Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Wyeth Ltd. [AIR 2013 DELHI 101]:

Decorative shape 3
Decorative shape 4
Decorative shape 5
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Wyeth Ltd. [AIR 2013 DELHI 101]:
FG Lawkit

By FG Lawkit

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. v. Wyeth Ltd. [AIR 2013 DELHI 101]:

Quick answer: what is this case brief about?

Delhi High Court ruled that foreign registration is a valid ground for design cancellation in India, overturning a Calcutta High Court view on novelty and prior disclosure:

FACTS:

In this case, the issue was regarding the registration of S-shaped spatulas: Wyeth Ltd. claimed that the defendant’s design was not original as it has already been registered in a foreign country before its registration in India: Filed suit asking to cancel registration of defendant’s design as it was copied from their design: Reckitt Benckiser argued that in the case of Dabur India v Amit Jain, the Calcutta High Court had observed that registration in foreign nations of a design is not a valid ground for cancellation of such design in India:

ISSUE:

Is there infringement of the spatula?: Is foreign registration grounds for design cancellation in India?:

HELD:

The Delhi High Court overturned this stating that the Calcutta High Court overlooked vital provisions of the act and the design needs to be novel: The Dabur case would also be reconsidered: Further held that if it can be shown that the design was disclosed anywhere in India or a foreign country by means mentioned under Section 4(b) then the registration is India would be considered to be cancelled and it can be sought as a defence against alleged infringement under Section 22(3): Only new and novel designs can be registered:

Video Summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mcn08pivylU&list=PL1DBVyVi7EaCojbQa5_XKBVJqA1y1REh&index=6

Related categories:

Trade Mark

Tags:

Design Cancellation:Foreign Registration:Novelty:Prior Disclosure:Designs Act:Section 4(b):Delhi High Court: