Hawkins Cookers Limited v Murugan Enterprises 2012(50)PTC389(Del):
Quick answer: what is this case brief about?
Delhi High Court ruled that Murugan's use of 'Suitable for Hawkins' on gaskets was not TM infringement under $§30(2)(d)$, despite undue prominence in marketing:
FACTS:
Hawkins is an established brand with its registered TM in India: Plaintiff sells gaskets (parts of pressure cooker) and uses the terms-’ Suitable for Hawkins Pressue Cookers’ in their marketing: Hawkings filed a case of infringement: Murugan (defendant) takes the defense of Section 30(2)(d) (Exceptions) - A registered TM can be used for parts and accessories:
ISSUE:
Is the defendant using Hawkins as a Trademark?:
HELD:
Single Judge High Court: it is reasonably necessary for the manufacturer of adaptable goods to refer to the TM of the relateable goods- this is not infringement: Division Bench: upheld this decision but added that the defendants had added undue prominence to the word Hawkins by printing it in big bold letters – they had to remove the prominence: Ultimately, the defendants were not infringing upon the TM of the plaintiff:
Video Summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tazZvmBxCjg&list=PL1DBVyVi7EaCojbQa5_XKBVJqA1y1REh&index=4

